Henry blasts 'moaners' Arsenal

Pfft! What a surprise. The coward Henry trying to portray himself as the victim after recklessly going thru the back of an opponent, putting bleeding stud holes in the back of his legs in the process. Pathetic! And the reaction of your manager and most of the media is almost as bad. Oh I am sorry Arsenal players had the temerity to complain about yet another over the top challenge. A|nd we havent even mentioned the stamp he carried out on Walcott either have we? Cloggers

He tries to avoid it, and he tries to ge tout of the way but doesn'thave the time and ACCIDENTLY gets him. I thought it was a foul too but the point is he got sent off because arsenal fans made such a huge deal of it. I've said this many times in the last day or so, everyone likes arsenal's style but people don't like them because the way they react to the slightest but of contact. If Rosicky is really hurt, why does he roll around? To make it worse?

They were very comitted. Do Arsenal have a magic sponge, because Rosicky's recovery is miraculous. He almsot scored a minute after being shot!

When Arsenal surround the ref it's unlike when teams like Chelski do it which is solely to badger, swear and intimidate them to sway the refs judgement. When Arsenal do it it's generally out of sheer frustration and anger because they have just witnessed yet AGAIN one of their team mates either A) narrowly avoid losing a lower limb by a whisker or B) Seeing a lower limb held in the same vicinity as the player by his sock. The visible wounds on Rosickys' calf caught by the cameras justify any rolling around in pain - this was no hammy Drogba platoon dive. It was a man in pain after being caught by another substandard oafish excuse for a footballer sliding in recklessly at full speed with zero regard for anyone. Fully justified red card as he escaped a nailed on yellow for surfboarding on Walcott earlier, how much longer was anyone expected to put up with Henrys clogging and borderline assaults? And now the world gets to laugh as it's always the leg snapping hard man assailant moaning, whining and b*tching like a little ...well b*tch, whilst Arsenal maintain their usual media silence when it comes to small insignificant clubs well beneath them :) Well done Andre Marriner. Instant red cards for the likes of Shawcross, Taylor, Boateng and Henry and the game would soon lose this ugly, reckless and dangerous edge. Sliding in from behind at 100 mph in the centre circle? Get the feck orf my pitch!

Bloggerwolf, even if for arguments sake we say that Karl Henry's red card was harsh, you would agree that his tackle on Rosicky from behind was atleast a yellow. Now considering his earlier clear yellow card assault on Walcott (again from behind) he deserved to be sent off. Wolves played well defensively and Hahnemann was out of this world but fortune favours the brave most of the time. We had far more shots on target, way more possession and much more desire to attack and win. Please move on!

I dont know how it could be play acting when you have stud marks down the back of your calf. Whether it was a red or not, the challenge was still reckless, from behind and Rosicky was caught. Is it only a red card if the player stays down injured or crippled? The worst thing is Henry got up and started mouthing off.

I did tune in to watch Henry when you played United at old trafford but he didnt play. Instead of focusing on the so called play acting and moaning about the moaning Henry needs to look at the stupidity of the tackle, Captain fantastic probably cost you a point. 2nd best player this season? Must say ive been more impressed with Doyle and Jarvis.

Doyle has been far and away our best player. Jarvis in my opinion started slowly but has got better, Henry has been consistent throughout. ManGoonian, I'm not angry he played on. He rolled around for a while, limps off but he reappears 30 secs later fine!

so is henry moaning that rosicky was still able to walk after his nasty tackle? It was nice of wolves to bother to turn up with a first eleven but embarrassing how they made no attempt to play football.

Here we go; Read that and still maintain he conned and cheated that poor little innocent lamb henry; Apparently there are four visible stud marks and, as a result, he is rated as 50:50 for the Champions League Quarter-Final second leg at the Nou Camp. "We will see about him tomorrow," said Wenger on the eve of the game. "When you look at his calf, you can see the tackle of Henry was not as innocent as it looked."

what I don't understand is why Arsenal fans have ingnored the fact that all the neutrals don't believe it was a red. But arsenal ignore/cover up anything that is seen as a bad result. They complained about us when they drew 1-1 with Burnley :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IuXbFRt8GY

The youtube clip clearly shows Henry's right boot with studs showing going through the back of Rosicky's left leg. The referee has a clear uninterrupted view of it. Wolves didn't clog us - they played with a fair amount of intelligence if perhaps an overdependence on time wasting - but couldn't be described as a physical side in the Allardycian mould. The foul was a bit out of context with Wolves overall play but that it was stupid, reckless and warranted a red card is beyond doubt. If he's appealing and the video of the tackle is scrutinised as it should be it will be deemed a frivolous appeal and the ban extended.

bloggerwolf, I hope your quest for site hits and controversy has now been quenched. Whatever you do dont end up becoming like Dick over at Vital Bolton. You are a better writer than that.