UK time is: 15:37:17
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Chelsea to sell Mancienne

The news that Wolves fans everywhere have been waiting for! Chelsea are reportedly ready to sell Michael Mancienne!

It will not please the Chelsea fans over on our Vital sister site, but the Express & Star believe that word is filtering through to Molineux, that Chelsea are likely to declare their intentions to sell Mancienne.

Vital Wolves Comment: Mancienne will obviously be a target for us as he has made 40 league appearances in the Championship and Premier League over the last two seasons, we could of course face competition for his signature. But hopefully Mancienne will feel at home at Molineux and will finally become a true Wolf!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are looking for people to help out on Vital Wolves. We need writers, match reporters and forum moderators. Perhaps you are a budding journalist or even just someone who is very opinionated? Well, why not join our team? If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.

Bookmark and Share




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Akela Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday July 7 2010

Time: 2:33PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Argh! Just when i started to like Michael,we up and sell him,Hopefully theres a clause in his contract so we can get him back someday if he turns out to be the real deal.
ThatShevchenkoGoal
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 14:37:00

Clearly the club have deemed him...not good enough for Chelsea Football Club! Good luck to him though!
TOPDROG11
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 14:42:00

If you lot want him so bad, then cough up 20 million and you can have him *wink* :P .. I think this is just paper talk though - not going to happen..
SLampard
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 15:06:00

He could well be at Euro 2012 if England wise up.
AdamDee
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 15:12:00

I hope this isn't true. He's a good player, might become one of the best. He's Chelsea through and through, so I hope the board do the right thing and keep him here!
JT_daniel
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 15:17:00

Its strange. he's had a whole year's experience at a PL side under a decent manager and with a team that have battled hard to stay up. You don't get much better experience than that. He's definitely more ready than Bruma so why not have him as third choice CB after JT and Alex (supposing Riccy goes)
LifeLongBlue
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 15:57:00

any news of the suggested fee?
merlin
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 16:45:00

I've heard 4million but not sure how accurate that is.
Akela
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 17:22:00

I would like Chelsea to utilise Mancienne in the same role as Wolves "discovered" for him, as holding midfielder. We need back-up or a real challenge for Mikel there and I think Mancienne could be it. But as central defender in Chelsea...no, I do not see that.
lindy
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 20:06:00

Maybe he doesn't want to be a 3rd choice and just wants to play regular football. Can't see him being an England Int. if he's rotting on Chelseas bench!
Nympf
Report Abuse
07/07/2010 22:25:00

Sell him to Wolves and spend the money elsewhere.
astraltrader
Report Abuse
08/07/2010 18:02:00

Lindy , He would be third choice in that position though as Essien is 1st Choice then Mikel !!! , Lets face it , Under a foreign manager , You will never have English kids coming through !!! , 4 million would be a great buy for Wolves , I think he has a few rough edges to Smooth , But i think hes better than Henry !!
ODDJOB79
Report Abuse
08/07/2010 20:18:00

As a Wolves fan, I'm with Lindy--I don't really see someone as lightly built as Mancienne as a central defender. The player has very good elevation and genuine speed, something Wolves could do with in central midfield or defence; but, as he is without an established position, I would not like to see Wolves pay more than 4m.
Nippy Lobo
Report Abuse
08/07/2010 23:35:00

I dont think his build has anything to do with it , I've seen him out muscle some of the Big lads in the Prem , Its not his Size its the fact he is too energetic to be a Centre Half , He doesn't know how to hold his position and sometimes let the forward turn , Holding midfield i think he would be 10 x better than henry , Henry has served us well but he cant be the answer , I think Mancienne Would be Ideal for the likes of either Milijas or Jones or Ardlene do go do there thing going forward
ODDJOB79
Report Abuse
09/07/2010 19:31:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Wolves Articles

Ikeme in contention for return (Wednesday March 25 2015)

Kuszczak v Ikeme (Tuesday March 24 2015)

Stats: Wolves v Derby (Monday March 23 2015)

Wolves in the promotion mix (Sunday March 22 2015)

No better time to face Derby? (Friday March 20 2015)

Stats: Wolves v Sheff Wed (Thursday March 19 2015)

Archived Wolves Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. johnwolf 5
2. 2648anil 2
3. kiawolves 1

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
5. Derby County 39 19 10 10 26 67
6. Ipswich 39 19 10 10 16 67
7. Brentford 39 20 6 13 12 66
8. Wolves 39 18 11 10 11 65
9. Forest 39 15 12 12 8 57
10. Blackburn 39 14 12 13 1 54
11. Charlton 39 13 15 11 -2 54

Breaking League News

Owls Strikers to Return After International Break
Sheff Wed : 27/03/2015 15:10:00
Let Us Know Your Thoughts and Ideas
Sheff Wed : 27/03/2015 14:38:00
Defender gets extended contract
Reading : 27/03/2015 13:31:00
Forest Sign A Lion Hunter?
Forest : 27/03/2015 11:24:01
McLaughlin: The Only Way Is Essex
Forest : 27/03/2015 10:27:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Can Wolves pull off back-to-back promotions?
Suggested By:  
Yes 40%
No 60%