UK time is: 10:16:27
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Friendly results matter, well sort of, we think

Following three wins in three different countries against Bohemians, Walsall and Charleroi Wolves went down to Reading last night.

But before you panic, it wasn't a first choice team as many of these pre season games rarely are.

Sigurdsson put Reading in front from the penalty spot after Stearman fouled in the box.

Reading's Antonio made it 2-0 deep into the second half.

Dave Jones got the consolation, but Reading ran out the winners.

Before the game we were not totally sure if Mick McCarthy would be too bothered about the result: "It`s nice when you win, and results do matter because they create a good feeling about the place, from talking to people around the area. But I`ve been more encouraged by the performances. Results at this stage don`t count for anything.' McCarthy told the Express & Star before the defeat to Reading last night.

The results matter, but count for nothing? Clear as mud!

So what did he think after the game?

Speaking to Wolves Official Website he said: "I never like to lose but maybe it`s not a bad thing. If you go through the pre-season winning all your games everyone thinks you`re wonderful but we know we`re not now. I don`t need a reminder of that but maybe it`s a nice reminder to everyone else.'

So losing is actually a good thing then? Ever thought of a career in politics Mick?

Vital Wolves Comment: So what do you think, do friendly results matter??

This website is 100% by the fans and we are looking for people to help out on Vital Wolves. We need writers, match reporters and forum moderators. Perhaps you are a budding journalist or even just someone who is very opinionated? Well, why not join our team? If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.

Bookmark and Share




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Akela Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday July 28 2010

Time: 11:00AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Better than 2009 for Ikeme (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Wolves target record points haul (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Champions of Division 1 (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Stats: Leyton Orient v Wolves (Monday April 21 2014)

Stats: Wolves v Rotherham (Friday April 18 2014)

Wolves standards will not slip (Thursday April 17 2014)

Leicester lead chase for Sako? (Wednesday April 16 2014)

Wolves would have gone bust (Tuesday April 15 2014)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. johnwolf 5
2. astraltrader 5
3. Southbank60 4
4. Akela 3
5. noddyboy44 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Leyton Orient 1 - 3 Wolves
Wolves 6 - 4 Rotherham
Crewe 0 - 2 Wolves
Wolves 2 - 0 Peterborough
Stevenage 0 - 0 Wolves
MK Dons 0 - 1 Wolves

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Wolves 44 30 9 5 +55 99
2. Brentford 44 27 10 7 +30 91
3. Rotherham 44 23 13 8 +27 82
4. Preston 44 22 16 6 +25 82
5. Leyton Orient 44 23 11 10 +36 80
6. Peterborough 44 22 4 18 +12 70
7. Swindon 44 19 9 16 +7 66

Breaking League News

Vital Posh MOTM Results -V- Coventry City
Peterborough : 23/04/2014 10:10:00
RUFC - Inspirational Words For Evans From Rogers
Rotherham : 23/04/2014 09:41:00
RUFC - View From The Opposition - Port Vale
Rotherham : 23/04/2014 09:19:00
Goodbye Sixfields (For Now) As Wolves Arrive
Coventry : 23/04/2014 08:00:00
Owain Pleased With Clean Sheet
Tranmere : 22/04/2014 22:01:00
McMahon - Plenty Of Positives From United Draw
Tranmere : 22/04/2014 21:41:00
Westley - We Haven't Been Good Enough
Stevenage : 22/04/2014 21:17:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

How many points needed to secure promotion?
Suggested By:  
101+ 8%
95-100 55%
90-94 36%
85-89 1%
80-84 0%