Jarvis to leave Wolves?

Jarvis and ... [fill in your own suggestions] Doyle Fletcher Hunt Henry and Jones... the core of our squad, which will take 5 years to rebuild ... good bit of business?? Is it hell. We dont need the cash. So unless the offer is for silly money why would we sell? Mccarthy has always divided the fans, and lets face it we've gone into overdrive simply over Ward... If he (and Jez) sold Jarvis there would be a revolt. Lets see if Jez and Morgan are here to build the club, or their own personal fortunes.

Utter rubbish - I wasted 2 mins of my life reading that.

Several millions for Jarvis :O:O ??? Is he an average player or what ? No ! Lol, at least 20 million pounds ! I think some players - Jarvis and Doyle (for example) should spend their career at Molineux, turning it into world class club again. Hi guys, hello from Wolves fan from Bratislava, Slovakia. I was on Molineux on boxing day match against Wigan - when Jarvis came on, he clearly increased the dangerousness (is that a word at all ?) of our side.

Sir Banksy I salute almost every article but this one, you've been overwhelmed by paint fumes painting the inside of the garage or there is mischief at play. He has already made a provisional England squad and second only to Doyle in my book. I finally got round to replying to your Manchester City report, which was excellent, and in my rather lengthy response went off on a tangent having read an article elsewhere discussing the differing approaches to our futures by West Ham and ourselves. Many are up in arms already about our lack of significant reinforcement at this most crucial stage of the season- having studied and watched this players best on the old favorite You Tube it looks like an astute bit of business and he will make an impact anywhere now I would say- I am not suggesting he will change our season (we are performing at a high standard with consistency, taking points on a ratio that if continues will spell survival and scoring goals finally). I think Villa have paid far too much for Bent, that's a lot of pressure on him- if he gels straight away he can save their season and lead them up to 12th, one poor tackle and all that expenditure amounts to worrisome times. I don't want to club to jeopardize it's future, and whilst I am pleased we are still signing clearly great young talents like this we still need to find that medium and it's fairly simple to me- we don't have to/are not in a position where we have to/or could spend huge amounts with our season in the balance but now just ONE big signing ON LOAN would make me happy- they should really push the boat out for Lescott, pay the full whack if you need to, cos his wages for 4 months or so will still only amount to 2 million or a bit more (a small price to pay with another 30million tv money in reward for a third season in the Premiership). The word revolt is mentioned above, and it may not be far off in terms of what we would see at the gate. Jarvis was one of our earlier signings in the 'new age' at Wolves, and considering how much he has improved in a relatively short space of time, considering how young he still is, he has to be one of the most important players that we build this club around. The fans are already upset about the lack of spending/signings- a Jarvis sale would cause more than a slight stir and rightly so. He has it all for me and just keeps improving as a player. On Saturday he ran back 60 yards to nod the ball back to the keeper because he had already seen Zubar had left a wide open gap. He crosses, he scores, his presence on the wing causes defenders wide spread panic (you can see how teams are trying to double up on him now- the boss has seen this, Jarvis has the vision and ability to feed the likes of others when the gaps have been left. He crosses, he scores. Matt Jarvis will play for England, no doubt about it. The club had the sense to tie him down to a contract and the only reason he would/should leave would be in the event of our relegation. If we do get relegated I would thank him and wish him the best of luck because he belongs at the top and he has earned it. In the event of relegation, and considering the inflated fees players are still going for, I would want 10 million for him in the summer anyway.

Some good mentions from Crete regarding other positions. I really can't see Jarvis of Hunt losing their place, and with other options available, Bia getting his chance, Kightly perhaps still one for the future (who knows because its continuously hush hush about his recovery) so with that in mind maybe we are going to see one of these players used at left back. Watching the videos this chap looks very strong on the ball, can go around players with ease and his passing looks clinical. If he can tackle, maybe Mick sees a very bright new duo operating down the left. Maybe if he does go left back and Jarvis is ahead of him, with Jarvis' tracking back already mentioned we would have a very strong left hand side. This is all theory of course because the main stumbling block means Ward would be missing....... and if a player is to be sacrificed, if you look under the heading Lamb in the Book of Mick you won't see a picture of Ward.

NYCW: I agree with you. He is an exciting prospect and will continue to improve. As I noted in my article, I, too, think he is a great asset to us because of his work-rate, especially when tracking back. But you also point to the problem of finding money to fill our problem positions. Selling Jarvis for far more millions than I guessed would help. In terms of the overall performance of the team, would losing Jarvis - who, for all his flair, is still inconsistent- be worth it, if we shored up our defence with a left back of equivalent quality, who is consistent. And we would also have change to add to money from our benefactor for a good central defender. Hey! Don't blame me, I am just the messenger. Have you seen the way Hammill's acquisition is being reported? Clearly, they don't all have the interests of the Wolves at heart ... but I do. In any case, it's a reasonable analysis of what on the surface appears to be a mystifying purchase.

Oh ... and to pick up another of NYCW's points, even though it is crazier than the one that argues that Jarvis is going to be sold in order to raise cash for a left back. It's his suggestion that Hammill is the new left back!

Wolves are said to be asking £12m for Jarvo, so I don't think he is going to go for less than £10m. Whether it would be a good move or not would depend completely on how Jez Moxey and Mick McCarthy spent the money. Unless they have a top-class signing already lined up, unlikely in our present position in the league, I don't think there's any way Jarvo is going to go at this stage in the transfer window. Unless, of course, Liverpool or Everton are offering us a very attractive exchange deal. Konchesky plus £7.5m? Nah! Looks unlikely. Prefer to keep Jarvo! On the other hand, both Steve Morgan and McCarthy were at Liverpool on Sunday, so were they wheeling and dealing?

At last, some sanity has returned to the discussion. People are now beginning to think hypothetically, in the way that I was doing when I wrote the article. A not very careful perusal of my comments would reveal that I was neither advocating the sale of Jarvis nor that I wanted him to go. Rather, I was responding to the conspiracy theories that were beginning to appear in the press. And surely they have some foundation ... or, at least, a degree of circumstantial evidence about them? Why should we buy another winger, one who would not displace the current occupiers of the two positions, when everyone knows that our priority is to strengthen our defence? The point I was making (apparently nor very clearly) was that, if MM realised that he needed a quality left back and central defender (and who doesn’t) but had insufficient funds to buy them, he had to think of a way of obtaining the money. In this hypothetical situation, it seemed to me that he might consider cashing on an asset, albeit a very valuable one to the club. As contributors to this report have told me, we could get up to £20m for him. I doubt it but we could hope for something in excess of £10m. That money would be useful. And, following, Mick’s presumed logic, he would have gained a decent, if raw, replacement in Hammill, and, if this did weaken his offensive left flank somewhat, the strengthening of our wobbly defence counter-balanced it. Moreover, as we played with two wing-backs against Doncaster, we have already strengthened our attack, though at the cost of weakening our defence. Hence, the hypothetical sale of Jarvis in return for the hypothetical purchase of defender or two. In this hypothetical world the sale of Jarvis makes sense and that is why I could bring myself to support it ... hypothetically speaking, of course.

I think all this talk of jarvis going is just pure speculation.. and I for 1 would be very disapointed to see him go. I also have to disagree on the consistency thing. i think he is one of our most consistent players, if not the most consistent. and isn't leigh griffiths a striker (not a winger)!!?? the only part of this article i agree with is that hammill is an exciting prospect and a bargain. i do think we need a left back. stephen warnock is available so we should try and get him, liverpool are interested in him though so if he went there then that would mean paul konchesky would be available. with 2 good left-backs available and having missed out on bridge, we should really try to get on of these 2 in (preferrably warnock)

It all depends whether Jarvo would like to leave for a bigger club. Most players find the better money and the limelight hard to resist. There are exceptions - Doyle, for one. I do not expect 'loyalty' from anyone connected with a club these days, but it is certainly nice to still find players 'sacrificing' something, a year or two perhaps, in the cause of their club. The club, in turn, should not stand in the way of a player's carreer. If it is any, two or all three of the M's who want to sell, however......it will be a great disappointment, to say the least....Wolves fans have been told the long-term aim is to make the club great again.........and THAT is certainly not done by selling the best players, however high the profit. Read more: It all depends whether Jarvo would like to leave for a bigger club. Most players find the better money and the limelight hard to resist. There are exceptions - Doyle, for one. I do not expect 'loyalty' from anyone connected with a club these days, but it is certainly nice to still find players 'sacrificing' something, a year or two perhaps, in the cause of their club. The club, in turn, should not stand in the way of a player's carreer. If it is any, two or all three of the M's who want to sell, however......it will be a great disappointment, to say the least....Wolves fans have been told the long-term aim is to make the club great again.........and THAT is certainly not done by selling the best players, however high the profit.

Wolves are at the peril of all the big boys just as we all are! if they come knockin there is no loyalty in players these days guys those says are long gone, man utd suffer from it with real mad, villa with city etc if they want him they will turn his ed n get him. Big Mic i like a lot straigh upfront and i would like him as a villa fan to get the credit he deserves, i mean he paid wot for jarvis? ok he spent on doyle and fletch but otherwise over last few years he bought from lower league clubs and turned em into bloody good players Salute to Big Mic i say

Jarvo would be stupid to go to l'pool or everton anyway.. he's the first name on the team sheet at wolves.. ya couldnt say he would be at l'pool or everton.. there's a good chance he'd be a bench warmer a lot of the time