Vital Football

Latest Wolverhampton Wanderers News

Was Vokes the difference?

Was Vokes the difference?

It might have only been a seven minute appearance but was Sam Vokes the reason behind our comeback against Swansea?

That's the question posed by AMJ1983 who asks: Do you, like me, believe that it was actually the 3rd substitution of bringing Vokes on for SEB, which nobody booed, was actually the reason why we came back into game against Swansea?

It's a simple questions which requires a yes or no answer (although we will throw in a 'maybe' for the fence sitters out there).

To vote use the poll on this page!

Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.





Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Akela
Date:Tuesday October 25 2011
Time: 2:23PM

Comments

0
He might not have put the ball in the net himself, but his initial shot did lead to Kevin Doyle's goal, whilst his run was crucial to the build-up of Jamie O'Hara's equaliser.
Akela
25/10/2011 14:25:00
0
I thought the complete breakdown in discipline and shape of the Swansea defence was the reason we nicked an undeserved point.
all4divisions
25/10/2011 14:33:00
0
It's a pity but I have just wiped out the Sky Sports and MOTD recordings of the match so I can't watch the action over and over again. My notes, taken at the time, make the following observations: Goal 1: KD converts a rebound after a neat turn and shot from Vokes. Goal 2: Good interplay down the left wing; JOH scores; great pass across from KD to JOH. Recalling the action, I believe that Vokes was involved in the build-up to the second goal and, as he was on the spot with his shot (though hit at the goalie), which led to the first goal, he must be given some credit. And, as my notes also claim, he was an improvement on SEB. So, he did make a difference but was it a greater contribution than the panic in the Swansea defence?
Southbank60
25/10/2011 15:23:00
0
Clearly SEB wasn't fit so IMHO he should probably have been on sooner if sticking to 4-4-2. The last 10 mins papered over a few large cracks and the Poor Swansea defence imploded on itself. sitting back against Swansea was stupid tactically. Personally, i'd have put Ward upfront with Doyle from the start. At least Wardy can jockey defences. Also, for me....the fact that Hunt wasn't playing was ridiculous. He is our match winner....he's creative, hungry and willing to track back and defend (unlike Jarvis). I think Berra should have been dropped for Craddock too. RJ needs someone alongside him with a footballing head (not a rugby player). I think its time to go back to 4-5-1 while Flecther is missing. We are simply not good enough to play 4-4-2. As for Mick firing shots at the fans......what a numpty. Regardless of their opinions the second you turn on your own fans you are F***ed.
Rustmonkey
25/10/2011 15:43:00
0
The problem with putting Ward upfront, Rusty, is that Elokobi has to come in at LB and that started the defensive rot in the first place. If we had an adequate replacement, I would agree with you, that is, if we could rely upon our four man midfield to hold the line and the back four to cut out the elementary mistakes.
Southbank60
25/10/2011 18:35:00
0
I do like Vokes, but I wouldn't put him ahead of SEB just yet. As for tactics, i would start with a 4-2-2-1-1. That is the usual back 4 but with Zubes at RB, Ned and KH sitting infront of RJ & Berra holding, with Ned breaking when possible to join the attack and link play, Ady and JOH in attack mid positions (not out and out wing play), Doyle sitting just ahead in the pocket looking to drop deep and link, and SEB, who should be looking to play off the last man or be in the box waiting for his chance. Regardless of lineups or tactics though, at this stage confidence and organisation is the key. Sadly, we look worryingly short on both. Lets hope we do better than Utd. UTW!!!
BIG TASTY
25/10/2011 22:39:00
0
Interesting team selection, BT. It reflects MM's thinking in recent matches, that is, withdrawing one or both out-and-out wingers in order to stengthen the midfield, while still retaining an attacking option. In my report of the Swansea game I suggested something similar. The two MC matches give us a great opportunity to try it out as there is no pressure on us ... except when the goals against reach double figures, of course.
Southbank60
26/10/2011 08:01:00
0
Vokes did make a difference but only becaues for the first time we got a decent cross in and Swansea defence were all over the place the same for the second why couldnt do that from start.
kiawolves
26/10/2011 08:07:00
0
Don't mention double figures,SB!Gulp! Lets just hope City keep it social. Winning a cup-tie 1-0 is exactly the same as 10-0...so there's just no need for it.
all4divisions
26/10/2011 08:18:00
0
As we know to our cost, it's not always possibly to defend a 1-0 lead, though, to be sociable, I would expect MC to relax after they had stuck four or five in the back of our net by half time. We can only hope to play the 'lame duck' card in order to induce complacency. Even better, if we deliberatley make mistakes - no problem there, then - and ship a few goals later today, we can hit them with a couple of goals before they wake up on Saturday. Well, it's the only way I can see us winning in the PL match. Hey, it worked at home last year and almost succeeded at Eastlands.
Southbank60
26/10/2011 10:43:00
Page 1/3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Login to post a comment

Best of Vital Network

Recent Wolves Articles

Derby v Wolves - Follow Live On Twitter

Wolves go to the iPro Stadium as the visitors to Derby today, this will be a 3pm kick-off.

Stearman - I'm Playing For My Future

On loan Fulham defender Richard Stearman has said he won't be the only one using the last two games of the Championship campaign to try and remain in head coach Paul Lambert's plans...

Who Features As A 2017/18 Promotion Favourite?

With two games remaining in the 2016/17 campaign, eyes in the Championship are already turning to the coming year of 2017/18.

Championship Free Agents 2017

As the summer nears and contracts come to an end, should the club have an interest in any of the following free transfers from Championship oppositions?

Archived Vital Wolves Articles

Vital Wolves articles from

Site Journalists

Write for Vital Wolves
Write For Vital Wolves
Apply Here

Current Poll (see more polls)

Derby County v Wolverhampton Wanderers
Suggested By:
Wolves win75%
Derby win25%
Draw0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
P Brighton 44 28 8 8 92 35
P Newcastle 45 28 7 10 91 42
3 Huddersfield 44 25 6 13 81 3
4 Reading 44 24 7 13 79 1
5 Sheff Wed 44 23 9 12 78 15
6 Fulham 44 21 13 10 76 27
7 Leeds Utd 44 22 7 15 73 14
8 Norwich 44 19 9 16 66 12
9 Brentford 44 18 9 17 63 12
10 Derby County 44 17 12 15 63 2
11 Preston 44 16 13 15 61 2
12 Aston Villa 44 16 13 15 61 0
13 Cardiff 45 16 11 18 59 -4
14 Barnsley 44 15 12 17 57 0
15 Wolves 44 15 10 19 55 -3
16 Ipswich 44 13 16 15 55 -6
17 Bristol City 44 14 9 21 51 -6
18 Burton 44 13 12 19 51 -12
19 Q.P.R. 44 14 8 22 50 -12
20 Forest 44 13 9 22 48 -11
21 Birmingham 44 11 14 19 47 -22
22 Blackburn 44 10 15 19 45 -15
23 Wigan 44 10 11 23 41 -16
R Rotherham 44 5 6 33 21 -58
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Wolves Results (view all)

Wolves Fixtures (view all)

Apr 29 2017 3:00PM : Derby County (a)
Sky Bet Championship
May 7 2017 12:00PM : Preston North End (H)
Sky Bet Championship

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.johnwolf3
2.Andie Spooner1
Vital Football Comment