Trend of Stupidity Continues

I'll come with you AdMant!.It seems crazy to me that we send game changers like Hammill & Guedioura out on loan given the predicament we're in.Maybe the're lacking "Wolves DNA"!

May be more than just "football related issues" going on here,maybe lifestyle not good,could be anything.There is something that both MM and Coco dont like about this player and we are not going to find out until maybe he has left.

I would imagine they are sending Hammill out on loan with the hope that he gets some first team football and improves his overall game and fitness levels. He is behind Jarvis, Hunt and Kightly in the winger division. He has a lot of potential but lacks a lot of basic football understanding. He is exciting to watch when he has the ball but his end product has a lot to be desired. In his 19 appearances for Wolves he has yet to score any goal let alone a wonder goal. I would rather he get some pitch time in rather than sit about not getting any action at all.

havn't we had enough of the backstabbing, moaning about this that and the other, it's about time we all got behind TC, the two Ms and most importantly the team, of the comments on this page only mike 1952 is talking any sense - admant you know my feelings towards you - you are and never will be a wolves fan you are on more sites than anybody moaning about this and that and having no quelms whatso ever about dragging the good name of WWFC in to the gutter, new york city ?olf - gobbing off from afar - easy when you don't have to spend any cash - your comments are not relative until you do, has for Hammill - he has upset a few players, the word was he chinned Wardy and as had a go at a few players. Until you lot are privy to what goes on at the club or are with the players on a full time basis -like TC and MM before him how the hell can you question what the club are doing - there is a reason for them going out on loan and they don't have to give you lot a reason, Adlene has hardly pulled up any trees out on loan so far, has for explaining their actions lol,lol,lol, why should they! wolf downunder - another mouth from afar! so why do other managers send players out on loan - managers like Fergie, Redknapp, Hodgson, Pullis, etc,etc, so they are not good managers! you mention M Davies ? offered a new contract and could have played ONCE HE WASN'T INJURED, K Andrews, kicked out of the club by the boo boys! Surman at the time wasn't that good and he had better players in front of him, McIndoe went for the money and if you look at his record he was always on the move, mind you were is he know? Has I have said many times before - just because some of you have a season tkt doesn't mean it gives you the rights to run the club - it reserves your seat -NOTHING ELSE, has for those "fans"????????????from afar - your best bet is to register for wolves world - you might find something out about the "club" you support????????? Also if you read about TC he and weaver have got the highest coaching badges that you can get in the game! so why do we need to get a top proven manager? look at the number two's who are managing know, Houghton, Hodges, Mouhrino, Trevor Brooking (twice at west ham) the reading manager, just to mention a few - but hey if they don't fit what you want - they ain't good enough, experts you think you are, were in fact you know SFA!

johnwolf why are you so angry? You can certainly educate us 'exiled' fans that obviously don't value the club by getting up at all hours to watch something that can be quite painful, but do you need to shout so much. I, like many on this site would never boo a manager. I appreciate the effort they put in and stress they are under. The problem I have is that we're sending players out on loan because allegedly they're not good enough. So who makes the decisions to buy them? Why can't they be improved? Adlene was an international, Hammill an U-21, perhaps something went wrong? Milijas is another one I worry about. Obviously talented, can strike a ball, decent set piece taker, but marginalised to the point of looking dodgy. Lee Griffiths another strange purchase. Maierhofer another bizarre purchase and then sold just as he'd given a glimmer that he might be useful. It's quite easy to say players are not up to the grade, but the number twos you mention have improved players or motivated those they have. I am afraid that TC is on trial and has been there long enough to know what goes on behind the scenes. Your blind faith is admirable, but from what you write you'd think that we made these observations because we want to destroy the club. Have a word with yourself. Try and calm down. We're all wanting to stay up, but we're frustrated because we know we're better than this. Maybe your anger is your frustration with the situation.

I picked up on this story and did an article on the Barnsley Vital Football about it. Hammill was great for Barnsley. He still finished the season as our leading goalscorer even after joining you guys in January. The thoughts among the majority of the Barnsley fans was that he would have been better served spending another 12 to 18 months at Barnsley before moving to the Premier League. The talent was definitely there but there was still a few areas of his game to work on and another season or so playing regular first team fooball in the Championship might have meant when he did move to the Premier League he would be able to command a regular starting place. It sounds to me however, that he was never really given a proper chance at Wolves. Why go out and spend 500k and not give players the chance? Maybe the loan will be a good thing and he will come back a better player, but I believe it more likely means it is step towards leaving. Good luck in your fight to stay up.

Weirdly I kind of agree with Johnwolf on the Player issue. Not the other ***** he spouts but on the fact that we don't see the players every day in training. Hammill clearly has something but as yet, he has failed to prove it consistently. Is this down to poor management or is it down to poor attitude. I have no idea if Hammill has been involved in any spats with other players but if this is the case then he needs getting rid of. The problem is, from a managers point of view, is that if you see a lazy player with a bad attitude 5 days a week.......would you play him on game day. I suspect most ppl wouldn't unless he was a world beater. Hammill is not good enough to tie Mad Mario's boots let alone have the same dispensation as him. You can put up with an attitude along as once on the field he wins you games. Hammill will never do that. Like I say, as for the other stuff.....sorry John but you are just a wee bit bonkers and in desperate need of anger management.

WDU: spot on. This must be the case with Hammill. It's a pity because I saw him play his first match, when he came on as a substitute (for Jarvis, I think). He livened up the team, looking sharp running the flanks, beating his man and pumping accurate crosses into the box. He's never really replicated that performance again but he has hardly had a chance. And why is Surman playing so well at Norwich (as against us) when he was at best a fringe player at WW?