UK time is: 23:37:20
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Stoke & Southampton set to bid for Jarvis

As expected following West Ham dipping their toe in the water, the bidding for Wolves star Matt Jarvis is about to begin.

Since our relegation to the Championship was confirmed the rumour mill has been in full swing in regards to Matt Jarvis.

Southampton, Everton, Fulham, Newcastle, Sunderland, Tottenham, Stoke, West Ham, Reading and Italian side Udinese have all been linked in the media at some stage since the end of last season.

Premier League new boys West Ham United were the first club to make their move with a 4million bid, which was rejected according to a report from Sky Sports.

The bid believed to be in the region of 4million was the price that has been most commonly quoted by the media despite many Wolves fans believing he is worth twice that figure.

But as expected, that initial bid now looks set to spark an auction, with the Daily Star reporting that both Stoke and Southampton are set to make their interest official with 6million offers.

The fee is already slowly rising, but just how high will it go?

With Jarvis under contract until 2015 at least we are in a strong negotiating position and unlike other recent relegated Premier League clubs our finances shouldn't prompt a quick fire sale.

Which means we can get the most out of this deal financially, if of course we do want to sell and Jarvis does indeed want to leave.

Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.






Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Akela Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday June 21 2012

Time: 8:23AM

Your Comments

so the choice of anti-football or a relegation battle.
gregory house
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Molineux redevelopment remains on hold (Wednesday April 23 2014)

Better than 2009 for Ikeme (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Wolves target record points haul (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Champions of Division 1 (Tuesday April 22 2014)

Stats: Leyton Orient v Wolves (Monday April 21 2014)

Stats: Wolves v Rotherham (Friday April 18 2014)

Wolves standards will not slip (Thursday April 17 2014)

Leicester lead chase for Sako? (Wednesday April 16 2014)

Wolves would have gone bust (Tuesday April 15 2014)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. astraltrader 6
2. johnwolf 5
3. Southbank60 4
4. Akela 3
5. noddyboy44 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Leyton Orient 1 - 3 Wolves
Wolves 6 - 4 Rotherham
Crewe 0 - 2 Wolves
Wolves 2 - 0 Peterborough
Stevenage 0 - 0 Wolves
MK Dons 0 - 1 Wolves

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Wolves 44 30 9 5 +55 99
2. Brentford 44 27 10 7 +30 91
3. Rotherham 44 23 13 8 +27 82
4. Preston 44 22 16 6 +25 82
5. Leyton Orient 44 23 11 10 +36 80
6. Peterborough 44 22 4 18 +12 70
7. Swindon 44 19 9 16 +7 66

Breaking League News

Walsall Fan Speaks About Facing Legends
Walsall : 23/04/2014 20:31:00
Vital Swindon Awards 2013/14
Swindon : 23/04/2014 20:02:00
RUFC - Miller In Team Of The Week
Rotherham : 23/04/2014 19:07:00
RUFC - Douglas 'Why We've Put Tickets On Sale'
Rotherham : 23/04/2014 18:37:00
Boss Praises His Troops
Crawley : 23/04/2014 18:01:00
RUFC - Play-Off Ticket Information
Rotherham : 23/04/2014 17:16:00
Board Apologise For Mistakes This Season
Shrewsbury : 23/04/2014 16:07:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

How many points needed to secure promotion?
Suggested By:  
101+ 8%
95-100 55%
90-94 36%
85-89 1%
80-84 0%