Vital Football

Latest Wolverhampton Wanderers News

Could Fletcher be first to leave?

Could Fletcher be first to leave?

Could Steven Fletcher be the first man to leave Molineux this summer?

The rumour mill had indicated that if anyone was likely to be the first one out of the exit door then it was going to be Matt Jarvis.

The midfielder had been linked to literally half of the sides in next seasons Premier League and one team from Serie A in Italy.

But while weekend rumours built over a possible move to Stoke, with Stoke boss Tony Pulis apparently matching the £8million asking price, Wolves chief executive Jez Moxey denied the stories.

"They haven`t even spoken to us about him." Moxey told the Express & Star.

Now considering we don't usually comment on speculation, some will wonder why Moxey decided to comment on this story?

Was it to try and settle Matt Jarvis ahead of pre-season, or was it to try and get the process moving on a little?

Reports in the Birmingham Mail suggest that Wolves have agreed a relegation clause with every member of the clubs squad, so that all of our players are now earning significantly less than they were during the Premier League days (yes even including Roger Johnson), so personally I cannot see why would be desperate to move him on as financially, we should be in a very strong position.

Although finances probably do not come into play in regards to Steven Fletcher.

We all know the Scottish International is desperate to continue his career in the Premier League, that of course is the reason why he signed for us in the first place following Burnley's relegation.

His next move according to the Daily Mail could be to Sunderland.

Sunderland have been linked with Fletcher already this summer, but things apparently could be beginning to move if Sunderland lose Stephane Sessegnon to Spurs.

Vital Wolves Comment: The news about the relegation clause that hands a pay-cut to all of the squad is significant news.

We all knew that the club was being run prudently and this is another indication of that.

Big earners like Roger Johnson, Steven Fletcher, Matt Jarvis, Jamie O`Hara and Kevin Doyle will now be on more realistic wages, putting us in a much better position when deciding whether or not we want to keep these players or cash in.

Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Akela
Date:Tuesday June 26 2012
Time: 10:00AM

Comments

0
If a bid comes in for £8m I think there will be no hesitation but to accept it. I'm not too fussed if he doesn't stay. I would much rather keep hold of Jarvis and use part of the 8m for a new centre half.
86lobo77
26/06/2012 10:29:00
0
If we sell? these players and get promotion at the first attempt then we will have to replace them at a far greater cost than what we sold them for, they are under contract - keep them for one season then if we don't go up they could be free to go then, the price seems ridiculous! for these two, when you look at Young and Milner £15million for Jarvo is not to much, also look how much Carrol, Bent and Torres went for and the goals they scored last season compared to Fletch in a struggling team then £25million is not out of the question. Make these clubs pay up or keep them.
johnwolf
26/06/2012 11:02:00
0
John, Just because Villa spent an absurd amount of money on Bent doesn't justify that Sunderland should do the same on an ex-Burnley and current Wolves striker. I think £8m is realistic. We could maybe push for £10m because he is still quite young. As for Jarvo I do rate him at £15m and would hate to see him go. I think this whole team should be built around Jarvis, Hennessey and Kightly.
86lobo77
26/06/2012 11:07:00
0
I'd hate to see either leave but who wouldn't want prem football and a big pay rise? Players don't have the same loyalties that they used to. If the money is right then take it and let the manager invest in the team.
Rustmonkey
26/06/2012 11:15:00
0
If one compares the ability of Fletcher and Jarvis to the players cited by Johnwolf, his £25m. price tag for both of them is a reasonable assessment. We could keep them and I think that neither of them would sulk. However, our preliminary forays into the transfer market suggest that we are likely to sell Fletcher at least. I suspect that SS has calculated that with BBS and our existing wing-men we can cope without them and that the money would come in very handy when looking to fill our holes at the back.
Southbank60
26/06/2012 15:41:00
0
It's not a case of what the club 'wants'. No club is going to keep a player they know wants a move, all they can do is get the best possible price for them. It's been a sport of 'player power' for some time now. If MJ or SF want to go, they'll go. Contracts only guarantee a club a fee for a player, they in no way bind him to a club. As for their valuations;they'll both go for less than £10mill each, i'd imagine. The point about then having to replace them with players of their abilities,should we be promoted, is part and parcel of the 'relegation experience'.It won't concern any player looking to move, how the club they're leaving is going to replace them. Lastly, whatever L'pool and others have paid for players in the past will have no bearing on negotiations JM will be involved in. There is no 'going rate', but we all know those extreme examples of over-paying are the exceptions and not the rules.
winstonsmith84
26/06/2012 17:10:00
0
Perhaps WS84, but the relative degree of desperation felt by buyer and seller has a bearing on the price. Moreover, Fletcher is a proven goal-scorer, even in relagated teams, and that should enhance his value. regarding Jarvis, a bidding war will up the price.
Southbank60
26/06/2012 18:23:00
0
Absolutely, Southbank60.Carroll to L'pool is a (maybe THE) prime example of panic-buying artificially inflating the size of fee.The world knew they had £50mill burning a hole in their pocket, with days to go 'til the transfer window shut. People at LFC lost their jobs over their transfers this past year or so, as a result. Buying clubs will definitely move on to targets new if Wolves are perceived to be asking too much. Wolves have done so themselves in the past.MJ couldn't deliver a cross let alone a performance, until it was 'shop window' time at the end of the season. SF scores how many with his feet? He scored more with his ears last season. OK, i'm slightly playing devil's advocate, but they aren't that good a pair of players and both still have plenty to do to be 'proven PL' class.I will say about JM, that he has good form in getting 'best price' in sales and purchases and i've no reason to doubt he will again this close season... nobody is going to give him £20 mill for any of our players, is all i'm saying. JM's good but he ain't THAT good.
winstonsmith84
26/06/2012 19:26:00
0
Winstonsmith84 you may have a point in panic buying as to the value of players prices but to say no one is going to give 20 mill for our players totally under values them. Put SF in a good team and he will give you 20 goals plus a season and as for MJ name another winger who can play on both wings and cross a ball with both feet and score goals.Plus they are still young men in football terms so why are people on here so quick as to under value them to such an extent we might as well just rip up their contracts.We should put a valuation of 15 mill on both players if some one comes close start to talk if not tell them to go to hell they both still have 3 years on there contracts and as far as i have heard not one of them has asked for a transfer.And why all of a sudden is it that our players are worth less than everyone else just because we got relegated we dont have to sell and not for some of the valuations that have been mentioned on here. For once on this site i agree with Johnwolf but i will leave out the swearing if we are to sell we want top money and for people to say 6-8 million for MJ in my opinion is a joke he his worth double and 15 million and above for SF it is as simple as that or they go nowhere.
kiawolves
26/06/2012 22:10:00
0
Jarvis is a winger that can play on both sides- and can't consistently deliver good quality crosses from either one.How many of the match reports on here, last season, pointed out that he had spent his time either under or over hitting his crosses?He's a liability when we haven't got the ball and played a large part in exposing the shortcomings of the forward playing as a LB behind him.He was one of those who people were calling to be dropped to give the holy trinity of AH,AG and NM a regular run. How soon people forget. He was outperformed by (when fit) Kightly, who was still obviously finding his feet again after his loan. As for Fletch; completely unproven due to the lack of chances and/or appearances for either Burnley or us. I'm not quite sure why he's considered to be such a goal-machine, though. He never scores from outside the box; his distance shooting is pretty awful so no surprises there. He doesn't create his own chances by going deep to collect the ball and runing at defenders.When KD played he did the leg-work upfront and when he didn't play, no-one did it. Very few chances were created for SF by balls from central midfield, but then he hardly spent his time screaming for the ball, having found himself space to receive it in. His whole season revolved around headed (or eared) chances from the wings, and that ain't worth a punt of £15mill by any stretch of the imagination. I'm positive neither of them will be sold for that, because no-one thinks they are worth it, rather than as a result of JM having shipped them on the cheap.So, if they do go anywhere for a figure of £8-10 million, i'd say Jez had done all he could to make the best of the situation. In keeping with how transfers are conducted these days, if either of these two fancy joining any specific clubs, then their agents will already have informed the clubs in question. JM won't be in that particular loop.
winstonsmith84
26/06/2012 23:48:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Wolves Articles

Fulham Sign Up McDonald

Kevin McDonald, heavily linked with an exit for a while now, has ended his stay with Wolves as the former Sheffield United midfielder has signed for Championship rivals Fulham.

Moxey To Norwich - Lopetegui Confirms Agreement

Departing Moxey is reportedly heading to Norwich whereas speculated managerial target Lopetegui has admitted 'he had an agreement' to come to Wolves before Spain appointed him.

Wolves Takeover By Fosun International Confirmed

Fosun take 100% control of the club's shares and assets from Steve Morgan with this deal reportedly seeing Wolves sold for £45m.

New Behaviour Rules For Referees In 2016/17

Well it has been a summer of change for the Premier League and English Football League...

Archived Vital Wolves Articles

Vital Wolves articles from

Site Journalists

DJWolves
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Sheff W MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Ikeme13%
Iorfa1%
Batth3%
Hause2%
Doherty44%
Wallace4%
Price16%
Coady1%
Saville2%
Henry2%
Mason6%
Sub - Le Fondre3%
Sub - Edwards3%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Barnsley 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Birmingham 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Blackburn 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Bristol City 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Burton 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Cardiff 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Derby County 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Leeds Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Preston 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Sheff Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Wolves Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.johnwolf5