UK time is: 05:50:18
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Pennant not going to argue with Pulis

Jermaine Pennant's future may not be back with Stoke.

The 29-year-old made his Wolves debut over the weekend, more than doubling the match time he had so far received with Stoke in the Premier League.

The midfielder played 66 minutes against Arsenal back in August and then followed that up with a 90 minutes appearances against Swindon in the Capital One Cup just two days later.

But until the game against Huddersfield on Saturday, Pennant hadn't kicked a ball in anger since.

'Only Tony Pulis has the answers to the questions of why I wasn't involved,' Jermaine Pennant told the Sunday Mercury.

He added: 'I've only got a few months left on my contract and I don't know if I'm going to stay (at Stoke), but I'm not going to argue as to why I'm not playing.'

Ståle Solbakken decided to make his move for Jermaine Pennant following the injuries to Slawomir Peszko, Razak Boukari and Stephen Hunt which left just Bakary Sako as our only fit true wide player in the squad.

Vital Wolves Comment: Would you like to see Pennant stay at Molineux for the rest of the season and perhaps join the club permanently?

Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Akela Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday October 22 2012

Time: 3:00PM

Your Comments

think only time will tell.
AdMant
think only time will tell.
AdMant
I have to say I remain highly sceptical.
akela
I have to say I remain highly sceptical.
akela
NOT WELCOME BEYOND JANAUARY.
Big Bad Wolf
NOT WELCOME BEYOND JANAUARY.
Big Bad Wolf
I tend to agree with the above comments although should he come good for us in the period before January then I would have no objection to the club signing him if the price was not too high.
astraltrader
I tend to agree with the above comments although should he come good for us in the period before January then I would have no objection to the club signing him if the price was not too high.
astraltrader
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Wolves Articles

Wolves interest in Julian Jenner (Tuesday August 19 2014)

Ward exits Wolves (Monday August 18 2014)

Wolves were unfortunate (Monday August 18 2014)

Wolves in search of quality (Monday August 18 2014)

Rotherham Frustrate Wolves (Sunday August 17 2014)

Wolves lose out to the Millers (Sunday August 17 2014)

Another Rotherham v Wolves thriller? (Friday August 15 2014)

Wolves and Brighton agree Ward deal (Friday August 15 2014)

Archived Wolves Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. johnwolf 9
2. kiawolves 5
3. Akela 5
4. astraltrader 4
5. Southbank60 2

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Rotherham 1 - 0 Wolves
Wolves 1 - 0 Norwich

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Blackburn 3 1 1 1 -1 4
15. Birmingham 3 1 1 1 -1 4
16. Brighton 3 1 0 2 0 3
17. Wolves 2 1 0 1 0 3
18. Rotherham 3 1 0 2 -2 3
19. Leeds Utd 3 1 0 2 -3 3
20. Huddersfield 3 1 0 2 -5 3

Breaking League News

Boro character praised
» Middlesbrough : 19/08/2014 23:26:00
Millers Lose To Hornets
» Rotherham : 19/08/2014 23:25:00
Reading 1 - 2 Huddersfield
» Reading : 19/08/2014 23:21:00
Boro come from behind
» Middlesbrough : 19/08/2014 23:15:00
Norwood Set For Reading Switch
» Huddersfield : 19/08/2014 23:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Can Wolves pull off back-to-back promotions?
Suggested By:  
Yes 42%
No 58%