UK time is: 14:37:59
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Wolves miss out on another target

Wolverhampton Wanderers had set their sights on two clear targets this summer, but have lost out to both Bournemouth and Hull.

It was clear that first choice summer transfer target had been Coventry City striker Callum Wilson, but Wolves were put off by the bidding from both Bournemouth and Norwich and the forward eventually signed for Bournemouth for 3million.

Another clear target was Sheffield United central defender Harry Maguire.

Wolves had previously placed a bid of around 1.5million for the 21-year-old with the two clubs holding talks regarding a possible move, only for Premier League side Hull City to also make a bid.

Their initial best reported bid could eventually be worth around 2million, but had around the same figure as Wolves bid as an upfront payment.

With Hull offering Premier League and European football next season along with probably an inflated wage packet, Wolves would not be able to compete financially.

However talks seem to stall at this stage and the chase had gone quiet for a few weeks.

Could the prospect of more game time at Molineux be what Maguire wanted?

The answer would appear to be no as this week, Hull and Sheffield United agreed a fee that could potentially rise to 3million, while Maguire signed a three-year deal.

Wolves head coach Kenny Jackett revealing that Wolves once again pulled out of the running for a prime transfer target.

"If people were asking if it was a three-way thing for that player, it wasn`t," he told the Express & Star.

He added: "We`ve said players who did well in League One last season are a category of player we`d like to take with us if we can. There`s a select few in that category that, if we could get in our team, we would.

"We`ve been aware of those but we haven`t been involved in this one."

Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.






Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Akela Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday July 30 2014

Time: 9:00AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Wolves Articles

Jackett identifies new forward target (Thursday September 18 2014)

Another fine point for Wolves (Wednesday September 17 2014)

Honours Even At The Valley (Wednesday September 17 2014)

Have Wolves struck a deal for striker? (Tuesday September 16 2014)

New contract motivates Evans (Tuesday September 16 2014)

Wolves miss out on Wood AGAIN (Monday September 15 2014)

Wolves get another point in the bucket (Sunday September 14 2014)

Margreitter joins Chesterfield on loan (Friday September 12 2014)

Archived Wolves Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Rotherham 1 - 0 Wolves
Blackpool 0 - 0 Wolves
Wolves 1 - 0 Norwich
Wolves 1 - 0 Cardiff
Wolves 3 - 1 Blackburn
Fulham 0 - 1 Wolves

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Forest 7 5 2 0 10 17
2. Norwich 7 5 1 1 10 16
3. Watford 7 5 0 2 7 15
4. Wolves 7 4 2 1 4 14
5. Charlton 7 3 4 0 3 13
6. Reading 7 4 1 2 1 13
7. Derby County 7 3 3 1 5 12

Breaking League News

Ole Resigns Position
Cardiff : 18/09/2014 14:28:00
Give Us a Reminder Please!
Fulham : 18/09/2014 13:06:00
The Excuses Come Thick and Fast!
Fulham : 18/09/2014 13:04:00
A Sad Tale of Woe!
Fulham : 18/09/2014 13:03:00
Forest 5 Fulham 3
Fulham : 18/09/2014 11:49:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Can Wolves pull off back-to-back promotions?
Suggested By:  
Yes 49%
No 51%