UK time is: 15:29:00
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

ONE IN, ONE OUT

The past seven days have seen further transfer activity at Molineux as Michael McIndoe left to join Bristol City in a deal reported to be worth £400,000 and Stephen Elliott joined the club from Sunderland to link up with former manager Mick McCarthy.

McIndoe joined Wolves in November, initially on loan from Barnsley. He was widely thought of as one of the players that we should have been targeting during the period where Glenn Hoddle was in nominal charge of the club, allowing the best of the available players who would fit into a lower budget join other clubs without any inference of an interest from Wolves.
He immediately impressed at Oakwell and was described as a "tricky winger with lightning quick feet" when we signed him. His move was made permanent with the opening of the January transfer window for a fee of around £250,000, with Wanderers exploiting a clause in his contract allowing him to speak with any club that agreed to pay Barnsley a pre-determined amount.

While it would be overly harsh to class McIndoe`s Molineux career as a disappointment, he never lived up to the standards set by fellow November loanee Michael Kightly. Most notable was his unwillingness to take on his full-back, often settling for a simple ball inside or back to Jackie McNamara.
After a reasonable start, his form regressed and he was dropped to the bench for the home clash with Plymouth in favour of Dan Jones. However, he came on after around an hour of that game, setting up Seyi Olofinjana`s second-half equaliser. He remained a fixture in the starting XI thereafter, but was often the sacrificial lamb in McCarthy`s substitutions, notably against Crystal Palace at Selhurst Park when he was withdrawn before half-time after Mark Little`s dismissal, and in the second leg of the play-offs against West Brom, when Stephen Gleeson`s introduction provoked a stream of invective from the Scotsman.

Did that incident hasten his departure from the club? It`s unlikely, but Mick McCarthy has made it clear that he won`t tolerate indiscipline (note the swift way in which Leon Clarke and Jemal Johnson disappeared from the picture following their reported bust-up at Stoke in January) and it can hardly have helped his cause.
McIndoe has since stated that he has left Molineux to further his international career and also as our style of play starved him of possession. Two observations to make here; for one thing, I`m unaware of the vast list of Scottish internationals that Bristol City have nurtured and I find it difficult to believe he`ll get more exposure at Ashton Gate next season than he would have done at Molineux. Also, maybe he should have worked a little harder to earn possession if he felt on the periphery of the game.

All in all, for the price we paid, he was an acceptable enough player, but perhaps it`s time for us to move on to the next level now if we really want to push for automatic promotion. I wish him well next season, other than on two obvious occasions!

So, we move on to the new arrival, Stephen Elliott of Sunderland. The Irishman is no stranger to Wolves fans, having scored on three of his last four appearances against us, including the equaliser in last season`s 1-1 draw at Molineux.
A quick trawl of Sunderland messageboards reveals a portrait of a hard-working, skilful striker with a knack of scoring spectacular goals - it certainly sounds promising. At just 23, he`s the right kind of age to fit into the new Wolves ethos and having worked to great effect with Mick McCarthy previously, he`ll hopefully settle in well.

The question must, however, be asked; did we really need to sign a fifth front-line striker, with Andy Keogh, Jay Bothroyd, Freddy Eastwood and Stephen Ward already vying for places? My personal feeling was that we didn`t especially need to sign him, but given McCarthy`s transfer record since arriving at the club, it`s probably better to side with his judgement for now.

We certainly now have competition for places in the striking department, the like of which hasn`t been seen since our promotion season, when Nathan Blake, Dean Sturridge, Kenny Miller, George Ndah and Adam Proudlock (remember Hillsborough!) were all to the fore at various points.

The next task for McCarthy has to be to strengthen the left-back area; Charlie Mulgrew, Lee Collins and Dan Jones all lack experience and are vastly unproven at this level, though all may indeed mature to become excellent players.
Rumours of a loan move for Arsenal`s Armand Traoré persist, though it`s rare indeed that McCarthy goes for non-British players (apart from the Rep Ireland lads) in the transfer market.





Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

The Journalist

Writer: King Henry the Eight, Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday July 23 2007

Time: 8:00AM

Your Comments

guys, that article is longer than the reports of henry 8s many wives and affairs, too much man, sometimres less is more, and mr 8 do yourself a favour get a less pretencious moniker !!!
Tonytime
Does it matter what he is called? The content is what matters. A good indepth piece on 2 transfers. All though not a patch on my Paddy a thouroughly enjoyable article. So we now have Paddy and Henry the Eight are weekly writers. This is good news for the site.
WolfMan75
got bored half way through far too long, but what do I know.
Tonytime
is that the left leg, oooh the hokey cokey, or is it ookie cookie, in out in out shake it all about.
Chris is Here
Good piece in my book H8.
Aston Smithy
Adam Proudlock indeed. What are Wolves thoughts? Or should that be an in the forum question? [Greyhound - Stockport]
greyhound
I stand corrected and greatly chastised, smithy is the man, so it must be good, just put a space between orplayers in the last para. cheers.
Tonytime
TT - All about opinions isn't it. I thought it was a well written article. Based on thw writers own thoughts and not made up of bits stolen from the internet. Which makes it a good read in my book
WolfMan75
I think it is a very good piece. It describes the posters thoughts on the two transfers very well and makes a lot of good points.
patrick cothew
If Paddy likes it, I like it
WolfMan75
oh, ok, terribly sorry old chap, very bad form to criticise, in this day and age, no failure here, everything tickety boo, mustn't damage the old spirit, what. oh yes only degrees of success, everyone can be what they want to be, i must get into this new everyone is a graduate, all and everything is positive spirit, ,its so, honest and true. my apologies i will get my coat, leave now and go back to my little village in crazydom.
Tonytime
TT - No need to be a tit is there. You don't like, some people do and have put their opinion across. Why don't submit something to the site for us all to comment on?
WolfMan75
wolfman, i might be a ***** taker, but at least i didnt go info outright name calling. anyway they are a very nice family of birds. I apologise, no really i do, there is nowhere left to hide for us non p.c brigade, its getting very frustrating. Consider me gone.
Tonytime
child
WolfMan75
great article IMO, nice one Henry. But less of the handbags please guys, there's no need to stoop to name calling. Some people want 2 paragraphs, some want to read genuine opinions that by their nature are always going to stretch longer. Th articles "nicked" from the Internet are news regarding Wolves Wolfman. You can aim the same accusation at Sky, the BBC, and a whole host of lesser organisations. With new writers on board we can now strike a happy medium between the two areas, which can only be a good thing.
Stuart Smith
very in depth and informative article, just too long.
Markymark
Mr Smith - Think you got the wrong end of the stick with my comments
WolfMan75
Apologies if I did Wolfman, maybe you did as well with mine.
Stuart Smith
I have to agree with his comments on signing Sleeves [Elliott], as I posted the same opinion here a week ago.
astraltrader
Blimey this is worse than being at home!!! I think the article is very good and well thought out. It is a tad long but it needs to be to make it all fit together. I thought the article Axle did last week was very good but I think he could have split his half and made two interesting statements, this one is just right, well done H8.
The Petton Wolf
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Wolves Articles

Wolves players to take Ebola advice (Friday October 24 2014)

Ricketts features for Under-21s (Thursday October 23 2014)

Jackett pleased with goals (Wednesday October 22 2014)

Stats: Wolves v Middlesbrough (Wednesday October 22 2014)

Wolves get back on track with a win (Tuesday October 21 2014)

11 goals conceded in 4 games (Monday October 20 2014)

Sign up to Vital Wolves today (Monday October 20 2014)

Wolves let two points slip away (Sunday October 19 2014)

Leaky Defence Costs Wolves More Points (Saturday October 18 2014)

Archived Wolves Articles

List All Vital Wolves Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Wolves 2 - 0 Middlesbrough
Wolves 1 - 0 Bolton
Wolves 3 - 1 Blackburn
Reading 3 - 3 Wolves
Millwall 3 - 3 Wolves
Fulham 0 - 1 Wolves

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Derby County 13 7 5 1 13 26
2. Watford 13 7 4 2 11 25
3. Middlesbrough 13 7 2 4 7 23
4. Wolves 13 6 5 2 5 23
5. Norwich 13 6 4 3 10 22
6. Forest 13 5 7 1 9 22
7. Charlton 14 5 7 2 1 22

Breaking League News

Holt Extends Terriers Loan Spell
» Huddersfield : 25/10/2014 14:57:00
Team News: Ipswich Town vs Huddersfield Town
» Huddersfield : 25/10/2014 14:51:00
Team News - City At Wednesday
» Norwich : 25/10/2014 14:19:00
Blackpool team to face Reading
» Blackpool : 25/10/2014 14:06:00
The Team Sheets - Derby v Latics
» Wigan : 25/10/2014 14:04:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Can Wolves pull off back-to-back promotions?
Suggested By:  
Yes 51%
No 49%